A WONDERFULLY open FA Cup quarter-final yesterday between Manchester United and Arsenal gave neutrals a fascinating perspective on two teams at crucial points of the season, and gave both managers food for thought afterwards as the season reaches its climax. It’s definitely squeaky bum time now.
Not that you’d think Arsenal had any chance of finishing this season moderately successful if you listened to the majority of BBC 5 Live fans after the game yesterday, phoning in yet again, saying it was time for Wenger to go.
Apparently, it’s a sad state of affairs when you are dumped out of two competitions within a week by minnows such as Barcelona and Manchester United, and maybe Arsenal fans are right to question the competence of a team just 3 points of the top of the Barclays Premier League, with a game in hand.
For Manchester United, yesterday’s fixture was supposed to be the chance to deliver a crushing psychological blow to Arsene Wenger’s players, but despite the victory, the truth is that both teams still have everything to play for, and yesterday’s result may have helped both teams rather than hindered them.
For Arsenal, the Gunners now can focus their strengths on capturing their first Premier League since 2004’s ‘Invincibles’ season. True, seeing success in three cup competitions is tough to deal with, but very rarely does a team winning the Premier League have it easy in the run-in. Even Wenger’s 2004 side had to deal with a hard-to-take FA Cup exit to United in a semi final at Villa Park.
Winning the League Cup would have given Wenger’s side a lift, but in reality the League Cup for a club like Arsenal is not enough to win on its own. As so often relayed by lazy football pundits, it is the Premier League that is your ‘bread and butter’, or as Wenger’s French would like to put it, your ‘pain et le beurre’.
With Robin Van Persie back to full fitness (apart from possible deafness), Arsenal still have a genuine chance this season of winning the title. They need Theo Walcott back, and a fit Cesc Fabregas is a bonus for any side, but Arsenal’s remaining fixtures aren’t too tough for the experienced Wenger to overcome. A crucial game in hand against rivals Tottenham could help decide their fate, but they also face United at home on May 1, a side that has struggled badly away from home by their standards.
Losing in the manner they did yesterday wouldn’t be too much of a worry for Arsenal. United are always going to create chances at Old Trafford, but Edwin Van der Sar’s man of the match performance said enough about the chances Arsenal had. Arsenal created a hell of a lot more openings at Old Trafford yesterday than they have done in previous years, and those pointing out that United had 7 defenders playing outfield yesterday should ponder whether a team with that many defensive players should be allowing so many opportunities for the opposition to score.
Indeed, it is Arsenal’s defence that now gives Wenger the biggest headache. Despite critics of the Gunners pointing out to a flimsy back line that seems destined to cost them one again, it should be mentioned that before the Champions League exit at the Nou Camp in midweek, Arsenal had kept clean sheets in SEVEN of their last nine league games.
However, Johan Djourou’s injury has dealt Wenger a massive blow. Djourou’s form since the turn of the season has been fantastic, with the 24-year-old Swiss international offering a calmness not seen in Arsenal’s back four since Tony Adams. It is no coincidence that since Djourou made the centre back position his own after the Christmas, Wenger’s men have remained unbeaten in the Premier League.
The dislocated shoulder he suffered yesterday will now keep him out for the rest of the season, and with Thomas Vermaelen injured and Sebastian Squillachi struggling for form, Wenger may struggle to hold together a defence now marshalled by the ever-improving Laurent Koscielny. Gael Clichy’s failure to understand an offside trap isn’t going to help anyone either.
For Manchester United, yesterday’s victory was more significant for themselves psychologically, rather than affecting the mental state of the Gunners. Coming on the back of two morale-sapping defeats away at Chelsea and Liverpool, United found themselves on the brink of collapse. However, a victory with clearly a makeshift set-up gives confidence to those players on the fringes of the United first team that they can have a major say in the rest of United’s season.
Sir Alex Ferguson said he opted for a team that would provide the most energy yesterday, and the likes of Rooney, Hernandez and the Da Silva twins put in a brilliant shift to rattle the Arsenal players. The United manager must now be more confident in the abilities of young talent of Fabio and Rafael as attacking options as well in the full back positions, and you get the feeling he would now trust Chris Smalling in the biggest of games. Smalling has matured quickly this season, and the chance to be the long term replacement for Rio Ferdinand looks increasingly likely.
In a tiring season for United, Javier Hernandez is the refreshing option that Ferguson likes at this stage of the season. The United manager currently seems unsure in what fixtures United would benefit from playing Dimitar Berbatov. Berbatov on his own up front has never really worked due to his less-than-admirable work-rate and his preference to drop deep, and despite Berbatov enjoying his most successful season, it is clear that his manager still feels United operate better without him in the big fixtures.
Hernandez’s ability to play on the shoulder of the last defender is something the United manager feels his team needs at the moment, and with Wayne Rooney filling in wide positions and playing increasingly defensively in the crucial stage of the season, the Mexican gives the team an outlet of relief up front. Indeed Ferguson has always enjoyed a counter-attacking team, which was evident when the Scot showed preference for Louis Saha ahead of Ruud Van Nistelrooy in the last few months of the 2005/2006 season.
United suffered burn-out badly in the 2006/2007 season, losing to AC Milan in the Champions League Semi Finals, and losing an FA Cup final to Chelsea days after the Old Trafford club had secured the Premier League title. Yesterday’s efforts will not have gone unnoticed by Ferguson, and despite a season that they have played below their high standards at times, the United boss may well feel they have enough in the tank to last the pace to pick up at least one trophy.
In another boost for United, Antonio Valencia’s highly impressive run-out yesterday will give the team’s effectiveness in wide positions fresh impetus, an area which was looking increasingly troublesome in recent months, as the team relied heavily on Nani to provide that magic spark.
The season is not over for Arsenal or United by any means. For United, it is somewhat unfortunate that success in multiple competitions means increased tiredness, thus affecting their capacity for each fixture they play. For Arsenal, staff and supporters may well be forlorn about the possibility of yet another season without a trophy, but with just the Premier League to focus on, Wenger’s critics may want to just see how the season turns out before they reach for the red button.
Sunday, 13 March 2011
Wednesday, 9 March 2011
FC Barcelona - The Road to Self-Righteousness?
BARCELONA lived up to the hype last night with a dominant display over English football's Barca-wannabe's Arsenal, as Arsene Wenger’s men limped out of the Champions League like an Owen Hargreaves comeback. Despite Robin Van Persie’s red card early in the second half, and despite the fact that Arsenal were still only a goal away from defeating the Spanish giants, the gulf in class was as visible as the fury etched on Wenger’s beleagured face after the game.
Barcelona’s statistics last night were incredible, but what is even more amazing is that they produce such figures regularly and consistently. Training, ability and dedication are all key factors to this, as well as corking sunshine every day, but the real underlying factor in what they do is the philosophy behind it. They play this way as a principal, as they believe it is the right way to play.
They are often very preachy about it, but, as we all saw last night, they are right to boast about it. It is undeniably great to watch, almost making you want to go out in your back garden at 10pm, to try and persuade your elderly neighbour who looks a bit like Carlos Puyol to exchange in a few ten-yard passes with you on his front lawn.
Barcelona as a club also had the much- lauded principal of having never worn corporate advertisements on their shirts, going back to the days when the club was first founded in 1899. This is still the case this season, with children’s charity UNICEF in its fifth year of sitting proudly on the front of Barca’s shirts. Rather than receiving millions for wearing the logo of a worldwide electronics manufacturer, Barcelona actually paid the charity over £1million a year.
However, this romantic ideology could only last so long, and this season will be the last that Barcelona sports a shirt without corporate sponsorship. The lucky name of the Qatar Foundation will now be proudly emblazoned on the front of the Barca shirts, boosting the Spanish club’s income by around £25m a year over the next five years. The Barcelona vice-president Javier Faus decribed the deal as ‘the biggest in the history of football’, but also admitted the deal would not have been signed if the club hadn’t had a debt of over €420m. UNICEF will stay on the shirt, but may have to play second fiddle in terms of location and positioning to the rich Qatar Foundation’s name.
It’s a sad story, albeit amazing how long it lasted. However, the problem of money in the current economic climate was always going to catch up with the club. It was something that fans all over the world knew about and consequently loved Barcelona for. For some supporters, the likes of Tranmere Rovers and Stockport County now had a rival for being someone's 'second team'. Along with the fact that Barcelona is a club that is owned by its supporters, who theoretically control the club’s destiny, the club is seen as somewhat of an ideal model in every aspect.
However this isn’t a piece on the economics, dynamics and tactics utilised by the Catalan giants. Yes, it is shocking how in last night’s game the only attempt on Barca’s goal came from the unfortunate Sergio Busquets, and yes Arsenal’s passing was improved and seemingly more effective once Van Persie had been dismissed. The game was over, and in some ways invalid, after referee Massimo Busacca had killed the game with his ridiculous decision to give the Dutchman his marching orders for kicking the ball ‘away’. Not that I think Van Persie was totally innocent in this situation.
It’s not the first time a striker has been flagged offside and then proceeded to shoot, pretending he ‘hadn’t heard’ the referee’s whistle, pointing to his ears in protest. The Nou Camp is a place where the noise of a simple whistle is easily drowned out, but I’m sure Van Persie would have actually hit the target with his snatched right foot effort if he knew he was definitely onside, rather than miserably driving it past the near post of Victor Valdes’s goal. Despite what Wenger and Van Persie will have you believe in the media over the next few days, I think Van Persie, although unlucky, was naïve and probably a little petulant in the whole incident. Let’s be honest, it’s not totally out of character for him to be in trouble with referees is it?
It’s not the first time a striker has been flagged offside and then proceeded to shoot, pretending he ‘hadn’t heard’ the referee’s whistle, pointing to his ears in protest. The Nou Camp is a place where the noise of a simple whistle is easily drowned out, but I’m sure Van Persie would have actually hit the target with his snatched right foot effort if he knew he was definitely onside, rather than miserably driving it past the near post of Victor Valdes’s goal. Despite what Wenger and Van Persie will have you believe in the media over the next few days, I think Van Persie, although unlucky, was naïve and probably a little petulant in the whole incident. Let’s be honest, it’s not totally out of character for him to be in trouble with referees is it?
But how many people watching the game last night were truly surprised by Busacca’s decision to show Van Persie red? Barcelona’s constant hounding of the referee was second only to the brilliant pressing game they were displaying against the Londoners. A Barca player goes down and the noise from the surrounding supporters is deafening, and referees at the Nou Camp, often succumb to the pressure of fans and approaching players alike.
It doesn’t have to be like this you know, Barcelona. You have the greatest club team around the moment, and you play a style of football that embodies just how beautiful the game can be. Small, diminutive players with world-class touch, skill and vision, yet also equipped with a fantastic work ethic. Defenders aside, there are also no physical giants on this team either.
Ironically, it was Wenger’s Arsenal sides of the late 1990’s and early 2000’s that seemed to argue that the way forward for competing teams was to have a disposal of players that were tall, strong, fast and physical. Thankfully for the vertically-challenged, the likes of Xavi, Lionel Messi, Andres Iniesta and David Villa have shown that real talent lies in your feet and brain, not in how big your body is.
Ironically, it was Wenger’s Arsenal sides of the late 1990’s and early 2000’s that seemed to argue that the way forward for competing teams was to have a disposal of players that were tall, strong, fast and physical. Thankfully for the vertically-challenged, the likes of Xavi, Lionel Messi, Andres Iniesta and David Villa have shown that real talent lies in your feet and brain, not in how big your body is.
In Sid Lowe’s brilliant interview with Xavi in last month’s Guardian (see here), it was clear that Barcelona players had a unique footballing mindset - embedded in by the club. Xavi said:
“I like the fact that talent, technical ability, is valued above physical condition now. I'm glad that's the priority; if it wasn't, there wouldn't be the same spectacle. Football is played to win but our satisfaction is double. Other teams win and they're happy, but it's not the same. The identity is lacking. The result is an impostor in football.”
If Barcelona want to continue their current image of being an idealistic club, then perhaps Josep Guardiola can instruct his team to make history and be the first set of players not to appeal for every decision that doesn’t go their way. The individuality of Barcelona supporters extends to its Catalan roots – they are their own people with their own methods. In footballing and politics, they believe in beauty and freedom. Thus, if their players were to suddenly seen to pacifistically accept decisions, yet continue to play easy-on-the-eye football, then there’s every chance that the young contingent of fans that idolise the club will try to imitate them on the field in the future, and hopefully off the field too.
The game's future could be saved from moronic, overzealous and overpaid centre-forwards subjecting officials to a barrage of unwarranted abuse. Instead of rolling around on the floor like he did last night after a collision with Laurent Koscielny, David Villa can instead choose to get up, offer to shake the defender’s hand, and laugh it off. Instead of pressurising the referee to send off Van Persie, Barcelona players can simply ignore it and play the beautiful game as they want it to be played.
It strikes me as baffling that a team who preach so much about the way football should be played should continue to abuse referees so disgracefully and cheat them into making certain decisions. Yes, there are other teams that also do this – most, if not all teams abuse officials and disrespect the running of the game. However, Barcelona are the only ones that seem to hold regular sermons on how football should be played.
The game's future could be saved from moronic, overzealous and overpaid centre-forwards subjecting officials to a barrage of unwarranted abuse. Instead of rolling around on the floor like he did last night after a collision with Laurent Koscielny, David Villa can instead choose to get up, offer to shake the defender’s hand, and laugh it off. Instead of pressurising the referee to send off Van Persie, Barcelona players can simply ignore it and play the beautiful game as they want it to be played.
It strikes me as baffling that a team who preach so much about the way football should be played should continue to abuse referees so disgracefully and cheat them into making certain decisions. Yes, there are other teams that also do this – most, if not all teams abuse officials and disrespect the running of the game. However, Barcelona are the only ones that seem to hold regular sermons on how football should be played.
Make a stand Barcelona. If you’re going to do things right, then do things properly.
Wednesday, 26 January 2011
Andy Gray – The Last Word? I Hope Not.
“Oh Andy,
You came and you slagged off that Massey,
So you were sent on your way, oh Andy,
You and Keyesy you boys aren't so classy,
But I’ll miss you, you know, oh Andy…”
OH Andy indeed. The now-former Sky Sports pundit is the current hot topic on everyone’s lips at the moment. Although if you tuned in to BBC 5 Live last night after the Blackpool vs. Manchester United game expecting a debate about Gray, you may have been instead enticed by presenter Tony Livesy’s bizarre and less-than-fascinating topic of ‘Where have you been barred from?’
Most of the responses regarding Gray’s dismissal are seemingly ones of joy. Critics, football fans and journalists alike have all rejoiced in Sky’s announcement yesterday. Comments on Twitter and Facebook have been amusing and often cutting. Many have praised Sky for their handling of the situation, although it was understood that if the 3rd video clip, featuring presenter Charlotte Jackson, hadn’t have been found and shown to Sky bosses, then Gray would have remained in his position as he had already been given just a stern warning, just as was then given to his ‘mate’ Richard Keys.
Going back to BBC 5 Live, Gray would have been alarmed at an interview with Ron Atkinson on the situation yesterday evening. Probably the last person Gray would have wanted sticking their noses in was the gold-plated Atkinson, although hats off to the BBC for trying to stick Gray in a corner with a pundit sacked for obscene racist comments in 2004. Unsurprisingly, Atkinson believed the dismissal of Gray was a bit harsh, before probably being interrupted by the BBC reporter as he trailed off whilst talking off about another programme which shows he isn’t racist.
But is Big Ron right about Gray? Possibly, although Gray’s comments were rightly judged to be sexist and derogatory towards women and to that he has no defence. However, Sky has set a dangerous precedent by relieving the former Scottish international of his duties. One must be truly naïve to believe Gray is in a minority within such broadcasting corporations to hold such sexist views. Gray’s sacking will simply make people in broadcasting more careful about what and where they say it, rather than changing attitudes altogether.
Many have already raised the issue on whether Soccer AM’s ‘Soccerette’ feature will continue after what has happened. The Soccerette feature involves an invariably attractive female parading about in a short skirt and football top, whilst being the subject of jokes and innuendoes. Those who argue in defence of the show that such jokes are done in jest, are in danger of being hypocritical. The Soccerette segment of the show has always been a popular one, especially with men, ever since Tim Lovejoy first cat-walked up and down the Soccer AM studio with a female in tow.
So are we to believe that we have all been disgustingly sexist all this time? Maybe we should all write to Sky and apologise, sending in a ‘My Name is Earl’-type list of all the women we have had naughty thoughts about on those hung-over Saturday mornings. In fact, critics would probably like to believe that Gray and Richard Keys would hang around the back of the Soccer AM studios, leering at the Soccerette and presenter Helen Chamberlain, dressed up as milkmen.
Gray was rumoured to be already disliked by a fair few colleagues and journalists within football, with some journalists not sharing the 55-year-old’s view that you have had to have played professional football in order to hold a valid opinion on the sport.( Although to be fair, Gray is probably not the only ex-professional-turned-pundit to share such a belief) Since Gray first boomed onto our screen as the regular pundit/co-commentator alongside Keys and commentator Martin Tyler for Sky Sports in 1992, he has rumoured to have since become big-headed and self-indulgent, again not winning many friends.
Many football fans have also criticised Gray over the years for seemingly hating their team with a passion and that he loves a rival team instead. Listen guys, he’s a critic, he’s supposed to have an opinion, and he can’t hate everyone. I have heard Everton and Manchester United fans say that ex-Everton player Gray favours Liverpool, and more understandably I have heard Liverpool fans say he hates the Anfield outfit and blatantly favours the Toffees.
Despite Gray’s lack of support over this current issue, it mustn’t be forgotten that Gray was well-received in his early years at Sky. I myself always liked Gray as a pundit. For years armchair supporters had been subjected to the likes of Jimmy Hill turning up at the odd BBC FA Cup game. Hill once famously castrated (not physically) Manchester United’s players before an FA Cup Third Round tie away to Nottingham Forest in 1990, claiming their body language during the warm up displayed signs of a team already beaten. United ended up beating Forest 1-0 thanks to a Mark Robins header, and went on to win the Cup, leaving Hill to take the embarrassment firmly on his magnificent specimen of a chin.
Gray was part of a team that revitalised watching top-flight football, and was perfect in transferring over the excitement of the new Premier League to a TV audience. Gray’s powerful, purring, raspy voice relayed the action on the pitch brilliantly when working alongside commentators such as Tyler and Ian Darke. Back in the early-to mid 1990’s, Gray’s acerbic tones made players like Ian Culverhouse, Michel Vonk and Ian Marshall appear to be Gladiator-esquein the fight for the Premiership crown, rather than the absolute donkeys that they were.
Importantly, there is nothing w rong with this type of passion. Liverpool fans have great memories of Steven Gerrard’s strike against Olympiakos at Anfield in 1995, where Gray was assisting Tyler in the commentary box. The Scot’s ear-splitting cries of: ‘Oh You Beauty!’ (Not a comment on any female stewards in the Kop) conveyed the emotion of the moment brilliantly, and made the moment even more memorable for those watching the game in their armchair. It was a great moment that showed you how much Gray loves the game, and at that point, how much he loved his job.
Not that Gray’s excellence was down solely to his sheer passion and love for the game. Gray was also tactically astute, and he is still one of the rare breed of football-analysts that can do the business both in the commentary box and back in the studio. Alan Hansen may sit comfortably in his bland BBC studio in his array of pastel coloured shirts, but he has never been one for venturing into the commentary box to join the likes of John Motson. Mark Lawrenson, who’s head is increasingly looking like a melted pumpkin, has made many ventures into co-commentating, but comes across as a dishevelled, bitter old man who has missed the last bus home, particularly when paired with Motson.
Back in the studio, Gray showed innovation with his ever-evolving gadgetry, usually on ‘Monday Night Football’. Not distracted by Keys’ sporadic and slightly disturbing looks into the camera as he asked Gray a question, Gray would use his equipment to analyse a future game or look back on the weekend’s action. It was fresh, unique and fitted in well with Sky’s insistence to be one step ahead of the competition. Such technical wizardry isn’t all that easy to pull off either, as we all know what happened when Andy Townsend invited ITV bosses into his pimped-up Ford Transit when the channel won the rights to show Premiership Football in 2001. Jamie Redknapp has shown sufficient nouse to be able to replace Gray's piercing views in the Sky Sports studio, but the channel is lacking a co-commentator of decent quality.
With Gray now gone, it is up to the likes of Townsend and co to provide not only insight, but excitement to our screens. But the year is now 2011, and a new breed of respected football journalists has arisen. The likes of Gabrielle Marcotti and James Richardson have both had their names mentioned on Twitter to replace people like Gray, and both been on our screens for a while now, with Richardson in particular having a big following ever since his days presenting Italian football for Channel 4 in the early 1990’s, and Marcotti appearing on ITV’s Champions League highlights programme.
However, despite the intelligent views that these two give on a regular basis, it remains to be seen whether these could do a job like Gray did. Richardson and his clever use of puns have a cult following, and he hosts the fantastic Guardian Football Weekly podcast. His quirky presenting style lends itself brilliantly to the tongue-in cheek style of the show, while remaining thoughtful and insightful.
Indeed it is this style of punditry and analysis that some people wish was more prevalent in the current era of football broadcasting. Whether it is an abundance of statistics, the use of Prozone or more Richardson-style punnery, the market for this style of presentation is there, but whether it is suitable for prime-time football is another question. Italian football may well suit Richardson, but the slow, almost contemplative pace of the Italian game is perfect for Richardson’s musings. But what about Richardson handling a big ‘Premier League Super Sunday’? Would his sudden ramblings about attack strategies in the Battle of Gettysburg really be appropriate during a Merseyside Derby?
Let’s not forget, football is traditionally the working man’s game, evolving from working-class roots. To alienate the working man in favour of a more middle-class and alternative broadcasting style is dangerous. Take ‘Big Jimmy', an oversized lorry driver who follows his beloved Walsall week in, week out. But one particular Sunday afternoon, 'Big Jimmy' has to mind the kids, so he has to watch Sky for live coverage of Walsall’s big FA Cup tie at the Bescott Stadium at home to the rich Manchester City. New presenter Richardson is in his place with his meticulously-grown goatee beard. Now Jimmy likes the opening credits – the montage of giant-killings from over the years, ranging from Sutton United’s victory over Coventry in 1989, and Mickey Thomas’s superb free-kick in Wrexham’s win over Arsenal in 1992. However, big Jimmy is less than impressed when Richardson starts the broadcast looking pensively into the camera, stroking his beard and proceeding with a delicious play-on-words that involves replacing Bescott with Joleon Lescott. All of a sudden, 'Big Jimmy' doesn’t know what the fuck is going on.
If change is managed carefully however, it should be embraced. Match of the Day-bashing is now all too common, but that it is not to say critics of sporting punditry are wrong. On the BBC we have Garth Crooks, who now puts so much emphasis on every word he says, that the significance of each word he does say becomes less and less meaningful. On ITV, Gareth Southgate’s fashion has gone from failed-Dickensian to University student from 2002. The channel’s football coverage hasn’t recovered since the death of Brian Moore, and it certainly wasn’t helped when Steve Ryder resurrected his career on the channel, looking like a cross between a bewildered English sheepdog and actor Ted Danson.
So as the future beckons for football coverage, what does the future hold for Gray? Gray is reportedly furious at the way events have unfolded. Rumours of a stitch-up within Sky are rife, though that doesn’t excuse Gray’s comments. Despite Gray’s critics, he surely had more fans than Keys. If Keys doesn’t get the push today after the latest YouTube video that has been leaked, then you would hope he would show some kind of loyalty towards Gray and do the honourable thing of resigning. The latest video of Keys asking Jamie Redknapp if he would ‘smash it’ is breathtakingly bad. Disturbing even. I wonder if Keys was ever caught ‘hanging out the back’ of Anne Diamond on that TV-am sofa all those years ago?
Since the incident last Saturday, Keys has apparently had the chance to hold up his Teen-Wolf-like hands and apologise to the female assistant referee Sian Massey, though the point of apologising now seems rather pointless. “Sorry for my sexist views and sorry for believing women are completely unable to learn a law like the offside rule, but what are you going to do eh? Get me sacked? Do me a favour love… Oh shit.”
You came and you slagged off that Massey,
So you were sent on your way, oh Andy,
You and Keyesy you boys aren't so classy,
But I’ll miss you, you know, oh Andy…”
OH Andy indeed. The now-former Sky Sports pundit is the current hot topic on everyone’s lips at the moment. Although if you tuned in to BBC 5 Live last night after the Blackpool vs. Manchester United game expecting a debate about Gray, you may have been instead enticed by presenter Tony Livesy’s bizarre and less-than-fascinating topic of ‘Where have you been barred from?’
Most of the responses regarding Gray’s dismissal are seemingly ones of joy. Critics, football fans and journalists alike have all rejoiced in Sky’s announcement yesterday. Comments on Twitter and Facebook have been amusing and often cutting. Many have praised Sky for their handling of the situation, although it was understood that if the 3rd video clip, featuring presenter Charlotte Jackson, hadn’t have been found and shown to Sky bosses, then Gray would have remained in his position as he had already been given just a stern warning, just as was then given to his ‘mate’ Richard Keys.
Going back to BBC 5 Live, Gray would have been alarmed at an interview with Ron Atkinson on the situation yesterday evening. Probably the last person Gray would have wanted sticking their noses in was the gold-plated Atkinson, although hats off to the BBC for trying to stick Gray in a corner with a pundit sacked for obscene racist comments in 2004. Unsurprisingly, Atkinson believed the dismissal of Gray was a bit harsh, before probably being interrupted by the BBC reporter as he trailed off whilst talking off about another programme which shows he isn’t racist.
But is Big Ron right about Gray? Possibly, although Gray’s comments were rightly judged to be sexist and derogatory towards women and to that he has no defence. However, Sky has set a dangerous precedent by relieving the former Scottish international of his duties. One must be truly naïve to believe Gray is in a minority within such broadcasting corporations to hold such sexist views. Gray’s sacking will simply make people in broadcasting more careful about what and where they say it, rather than changing attitudes altogether.
Many have already raised the issue on whether Soccer AM’s ‘Soccerette’ feature will continue after what has happened. The Soccerette feature involves an invariably attractive female parading about in a short skirt and football top, whilst being the subject of jokes and innuendoes. Those who argue in defence of the show that such jokes are done in jest, are in danger of being hypocritical. The Soccerette segment of the show has always been a popular one, especially with men, ever since Tim Lovejoy first cat-walked up and down the Soccer AM studio with a female in tow.
So are we to believe that we have all been disgustingly sexist all this time? Maybe we should all write to Sky and apologise, sending in a ‘My Name is Earl’-type list of all the women we have had naughty thoughts about on those hung-over Saturday mornings. In fact, critics would probably like to believe that Gray and Richard Keys would hang around the back of the Soccer AM studios, leering at the Soccerette and presenter Helen Chamberlain, dressed up as milkmen.
Gray was rumoured to be already disliked by a fair few colleagues and journalists within football, with some journalists not sharing the 55-year-old’s view that you have had to have played professional football in order to hold a valid opinion on the sport.( Although to be fair, Gray is probably not the only ex-professional-turned-pundit to share such a belief) Since Gray first boomed onto our screen as the regular pundit/co-commentator alongside Keys and commentator Martin Tyler for Sky Sports in 1992, he has rumoured to have since become big-headed and self-indulgent, again not winning many friends.
Many football fans have also criticised Gray over the years for seemingly hating their team with a passion and that he loves a rival team instead. Listen guys, he’s a critic, he’s supposed to have an opinion, and he can’t hate everyone. I have heard Everton and Manchester United fans say that ex-Everton player Gray favours Liverpool, and more understandably I have heard Liverpool fans say he hates the Anfield outfit and blatantly favours the Toffees.
Despite Gray’s lack of support over this current issue, it mustn’t be forgotten that Gray was well-received in his early years at Sky. I myself always liked Gray as a pundit. For years armchair supporters had been subjected to the likes of Jimmy Hill turning up at the odd BBC FA Cup game. Hill once famously castrated (not physically) Manchester United’s players before an FA Cup Third Round tie away to Nottingham Forest in 1990, claiming their body language during the warm up displayed signs of a team already beaten. United ended up beating Forest 1-0 thanks to a Mark Robins header, and went on to win the Cup, leaving Hill to take the embarrassment firmly on his magnificent specimen of a chin.
Gray was part of a team that revitalised watching top-flight football, and was perfect in transferring over the excitement of the new Premier League to a TV audience. Gray’s powerful, purring, raspy voice relayed the action on the pitch brilliantly when working alongside commentators such as Tyler and Ian Darke. Back in the early-to mid 1990’s, Gray’s acerbic tones made players like Ian Culverhouse, Michel Vonk and Ian Marshall appear to be Gladiator-esquein the fight for the Premiership crown, rather than the absolute donkeys that they were.
Importantly, there is nothing w rong with this type of passion. Liverpool fans have great memories of Steven Gerrard’s strike against Olympiakos at Anfield in 1995, where Gray was assisting Tyler in the commentary box. The Scot’s ear-splitting cries of: ‘Oh You Beauty!’ (Not a comment on any female stewards in the Kop) conveyed the emotion of the moment brilliantly, and made the moment even more memorable for those watching the game in their armchair. It was a great moment that showed you how much Gray loves the game, and at that point, how much he loved his job.
Not that Gray’s excellence was down solely to his sheer passion and love for the game. Gray was also tactically astute, and he is still one of the rare breed of football-analysts that can do the business both in the commentary box and back in the studio. Alan Hansen may sit comfortably in his bland BBC studio in his array of pastel coloured shirts, but he has never been one for venturing into the commentary box to join the likes of John Motson. Mark Lawrenson, who’s head is increasingly looking like a melted pumpkin, has made many ventures into co-commentating, but comes across as a dishevelled, bitter old man who has missed the last bus home, particularly when paired with Motson.
Back in the studio, Gray showed innovation with his ever-evolving gadgetry, usually on ‘Monday Night Football’. Not distracted by Keys’ sporadic and slightly disturbing looks into the camera as he asked Gray a question, Gray would use his equipment to analyse a future game or look back on the weekend’s action. It was fresh, unique and fitted in well with Sky’s insistence to be one step ahead of the competition. Such technical wizardry isn’t all that easy to pull off either, as we all know what happened when Andy Townsend invited ITV bosses into his pimped-up Ford Transit when the channel won the rights to show Premiership Football in 2001. Jamie Redknapp has shown sufficient nouse to be able to replace Gray's piercing views in the Sky Sports studio, but the channel is lacking a co-commentator of decent quality.
With Gray now gone, it is up to the likes of Townsend and co to provide not only insight, but excitement to our screens. But the year is now 2011, and a new breed of respected football journalists has arisen. The likes of Gabrielle Marcotti and James Richardson have both had their names mentioned on Twitter to replace people like Gray, and both been on our screens for a while now, with Richardson in particular having a big following ever since his days presenting Italian football for Channel 4 in the early 1990’s, and Marcotti appearing on ITV’s Champions League highlights programme.
However, despite the intelligent views that these two give on a regular basis, it remains to be seen whether these could do a job like Gray did. Richardson and his clever use of puns have a cult following, and he hosts the fantastic Guardian Football Weekly podcast. His quirky presenting style lends itself brilliantly to the tongue-in cheek style of the show, while remaining thoughtful and insightful.
Indeed it is this style of punditry and analysis that some people wish was more prevalent in the current era of football broadcasting. Whether it is an abundance of statistics, the use of Prozone or more Richardson-style punnery, the market for this style of presentation is there, but whether it is suitable for prime-time football is another question. Italian football may well suit Richardson, but the slow, almost contemplative pace of the Italian game is perfect for Richardson’s musings. But what about Richardson handling a big ‘Premier League Super Sunday’? Would his sudden ramblings about attack strategies in the Battle of Gettysburg really be appropriate during a Merseyside Derby?
Let’s not forget, football is traditionally the working man’s game, evolving from working-class roots. To alienate the working man in favour of a more middle-class and alternative broadcasting style is dangerous. Take ‘Big Jimmy', an oversized lorry driver who follows his beloved Walsall week in, week out. But one particular Sunday afternoon, 'Big Jimmy' has to mind the kids, so he has to watch Sky for live coverage of Walsall’s big FA Cup tie at the Bescott Stadium at home to the rich Manchester City. New presenter Richardson is in his place with his meticulously-grown goatee beard. Now Jimmy likes the opening credits – the montage of giant-killings from over the years, ranging from Sutton United’s victory over Coventry in 1989, and Mickey Thomas’s superb free-kick in Wrexham’s win over Arsenal in 1992. However, big Jimmy is less than impressed when Richardson starts the broadcast looking pensively into the camera, stroking his beard and proceeding with a delicious play-on-words that involves replacing Bescott with Joleon Lescott. All of a sudden, 'Big Jimmy' doesn’t know what the fuck is going on.
If change is managed carefully however, it should be embraced. Match of the Day-bashing is now all too common, but that it is not to say critics of sporting punditry are wrong. On the BBC we have Garth Crooks, who now puts so much emphasis on every word he says, that the significance of each word he does say becomes less and less meaningful. On ITV, Gareth Southgate’s fashion has gone from failed-Dickensian to University student from 2002. The channel’s football coverage hasn’t recovered since the death of Brian Moore, and it certainly wasn’t helped when Steve Ryder resurrected his career on the channel, looking like a cross between a bewildered English sheepdog and actor Ted Danson.
So as the future beckons for football coverage, what does the future hold for Gray? Gray is reportedly furious at the way events have unfolded. Rumours of a stitch-up within Sky are rife, though that doesn’t excuse Gray’s comments. Despite Gray’s critics, he surely had more fans than Keys. If Keys doesn’t get the push today after the latest YouTube video that has been leaked, then you would hope he would show some kind of loyalty towards Gray and do the honourable thing of resigning. The latest video of Keys asking Jamie Redknapp if he would ‘smash it’ is breathtakingly bad. Disturbing even. I wonder if Keys was ever caught ‘hanging out the back’ of Anne Diamond on that TV-am sofa all those years ago?
Since the incident last Saturday, Keys has apparently had the chance to hold up his Teen-Wolf-like hands and apologise to the female assistant referee Sian Massey, though the point of apologising now seems rather pointless. “Sorry for my sexist views and sorry for believing women are completely unable to learn a law like the offside rule, but what are you going to do eh? Get me sacked? Do me a favour love… Oh shit.”
Thursday, 30 December 2010
Anfield of Nightmares
AFTER yet another dismal showing last night in front of a foolishly-expectant home crowd at Anfield, Liverpool Football Club remains in relative-crisis mode. The 1-0 defeat to Wolverhampton Wanderers was one that should have been avoided, but now we are subject to more excuses as to why the Merseysiders failed to turn up.
One point argued by Sky Sports pundit Andy Gray last night was that Liverpool looked rusty, having had their last two league games postponed and over a fortnight's rest. Wolves on the other hand, played only three days ago, slumping to a 2-1 home defeat to Wigan Athletic. In Gray’s opinion, Mick McCarthy’s merry men were a whole lot sharper than Roy Hodgson’s Scouse screw-ups.
Gray’s arguments could be seen as perfectly valid if it were not for the fact that throughout the season we are subject to managers complaining about fixture congestion and players underperforming due to too many games in too short a space of time.
Liverpool’s rest period of 17 days would be envied by other teams, but for a team whose best players would seemingly benefit from rest and recuperation from past injury problems, it has not worked out. The recent postponements meant Steven Gerrard was allowed time to return from a hamstring problem and Fernando Torres, if we are to believe what we are constantly subjected to by media sources, was given his first rest since he was 10 years old.
Also within this time period, it seems Glen Johnson has reverted to a Benjamin Button-esque state, now possessing the footballing capabilities of his 12-year-old self. One moment in last night’s first half was of particularly naïve nature, as he needlessly booted the ball out across his own box for a throw-in. Rather than holding his hands-up and admitting the act of travesty, he instead appeared to signal to his forward players that they should have already been in the stands waiting for it. If Liverpool are to miraculously gain a place in Europe by May, expect a 3-year-old nappy-wearing Johnson to be held aloft by Pepe Reina in front of the Kop amidst the celebrations, and then given the opportunity to complete five-yard passes to Martin Skrtel and Jamie Carragher.
The truth is that there is a combination of on-pitch factors which are directly affecting the team’s success. David Ngog is not going to be the next Thierry Henry, and just as it took Sir Alex Ferguson years to realise David Bellion wasn’t either, Liverpool should get rid of the young Frenchman. Any hopes of a possible partnership with Fernando Torres were surely vanquished last night, as both forwards struggled to hold up the ball and allow midfielders to join the attack.
Liverpool’s problems stem from this ability to not keep the ball in the final third. Fernando Torres is not the same player he was two years ago, and it looks often like English defences have him well and truly found out. Those who claim the Spaniard is still unfit must be as tired of their own voices as journalists are. Wolves last night were quick to close down the striker when he was receiving passes, but in reality they didn’t have to try too hard as the Spaniard’s control let him down more as the game went on.
Supporters of Torres who claim the Spaniard has poor support and delivery from teammates should look at the likes of Darren Bent, a player who has never played with a Gerrard, a Beckham or a Bergkamp, yet has consistently scored throughout his career in the Premiership. Torres looks constantly unhappy nowadays, but I’m sure his body language would be even more vitriolic if he were being supplied with through balls by Bent’s current teammates Kieran Richardson and Phil Bardsley.
There is a severe lack of confidence amongst the Liverpool team, but this is not something which the Charlie Chalk-lookalike Hodgson has solely instilled. Rafael Benitez’s Liverpool last season were at times equally awful, bowing out of the FA Cup early to Reading in a pitiful performance, and suffering the same tactical problems as Hodgson faces now.
Tactically, Liverpool’s biggest problem may lie in their reputation. Hodgson may have saved Fulham from relegation and moulded them into a capable outfit, but they were often playing teams who were open and not afraid of going for the jugular. Liverpool however, are still a club that can inspire fear, and with big names likes Gerrard, Torres and Reina, opposing sides often set-up with men behind the ball, frustrating the Merseysiders and limiting their opportunities.
It would be no surprise if at the time this article was published Hodgson had either handed in his resignation or had it terminated. His appointment was generally to be considered as a stop-gap. He was an elderly, experienced coach, who, though often appeared to be going blind, could help guide Liverpool through what was always going to be a transitional period.
The mid-table position comes as no surprise to many who have seen the decline of the team in the last 18 months or so, but many of the Kop faithful have found it hard during this period to accept Hodgson as the bloke responsible for managing their beloved club.
However, Hodgson should surely have not been expected to win titles and trophies. He was hardly achieving such feats at Fulham during his reign at Craven Cottage; instead he was battling against the odds and achieving commendable results and performances on a shoe-string budget. Indeed many Liverpool fans that were aware of financial restraints in the summer saw Hodgson as the perfect replacement to deal with such circumstances, due to his Fulham record.
Inheriting a Liverpool team in decline, Hodgson’s role was to steady the Liverpool ship and rebuild for the future, possibly for another manager to take charge when the team looks like it can win big trophies again, and consequently win all the plaudits. Rather like when former-boss Benitez took over Gerard Houlier's side in 2004.
There is nothing wrong with replacing Hodgson mid-season, and replacing him with someone like the heavily respected but equally-dour Kenny Dalglish. Most Liverpool fans would most probably desire a manager who isn't making decisions like playing Ngog and Torres up front together, employing Raul Meireles in a wide position, or simply playing Paul Konchesky.
Indeed, if something is not working and you don’t intend to continue with the set-up in a few years time anyway, then by all means cut your losses. However, as other teams get richer and rivals improve, Liverpool cannot afford to slip too far away. The club lacks a direction and a plan of attack – on and off the field. A short-term replacement for Hodgson however, is unlikely to have the galvanising effect that most Liverpool fans would like.
Finally, for those of you who wish to see old Roy first step on the shores of Liverpool docks back in the summer, please look at this rare clip...
One point argued by Sky Sports pundit Andy Gray last night was that Liverpool looked rusty, having had their last two league games postponed and over a fortnight's rest. Wolves on the other hand, played only three days ago, slumping to a 2-1 home defeat to Wigan Athletic. In Gray’s opinion, Mick McCarthy’s merry men were a whole lot sharper than Roy Hodgson’s Scouse screw-ups.
Gray’s arguments could be seen as perfectly valid if it were not for the fact that throughout the season we are subject to managers complaining about fixture congestion and players underperforming due to too many games in too short a space of time.
Liverpool’s rest period of 17 days would be envied by other teams, but for a team whose best players would seemingly benefit from rest and recuperation from past injury problems, it has not worked out. The recent postponements meant Steven Gerrard was allowed time to return from a hamstring problem and Fernando Torres, if we are to believe what we are constantly subjected to by media sources, was given his first rest since he was 10 years old.
Also within this time period, it seems Glen Johnson has reverted to a Benjamin Button-esque state, now possessing the footballing capabilities of his 12-year-old self. One moment in last night’s first half was of particularly naïve nature, as he needlessly booted the ball out across his own box for a throw-in. Rather than holding his hands-up and admitting the act of travesty, he instead appeared to signal to his forward players that they should have already been in the stands waiting for it. If Liverpool are to miraculously gain a place in Europe by May, expect a 3-year-old nappy-wearing Johnson to be held aloft by Pepe Reina in front of the Kop amidst the celebrations, and then given the opportunity to complete five-yard passes to Martin Skrtel and Jamie Carragher.
The truth is that there is a combination of on-pitch factors which are directly affecting the team’s success. David Ngog is not going to be the next Thierry Henry, and just as it took Sir Alex Ferguson years to realise David Bellion wasn’t either, Liverpool should get rid of the young Frenchman. Any hopes of a possible partnership with Fernando Torres were surely vanquished last night, as both forwards struggled to hold up the ball and allow midfielders to join the attack.
Liverpool’s problems stem from this ability to not keep the ball in the final third. Fernando Torres is not the same player he was two years ago, and it looks often like English defences have him well and truly found out. Those who claim the Spaniard is still unfit must be as tired of their own voices as journalists are. Wolves last night were quick to close down the striker when he was receiving passes, but in reality they didn’t have to try too hard as the Spaniard’s control let him down more as the game went on.
Supporters of Torres who claim the Spaniard has poor support and delivery from teammates should look at the likes of Darren Bent, a player who has never played with a Gerrard, a Beckham or a Bergkamp, yet has consistently scored throughout his career in the Premiership. Torres looks constantly unhappy nowadays, but I’m sure his body language would be even more vitriolic if he were being supplied with through balls by Bent’s current teammates Kieran Richardson and Phil Bardsley.
There is a severe lack of confidence amongst the Liverpool team, but this is not something which the Charlie Chalk-lookalike Hodgson has solely instilled. Rafael Benitez’s Liverpool last season were at times equally awful, bowing out of the FA Cup early to Reading in a pitiful performance, and suffering the same tactical problems as Hodgson faces now.
Tactically, Liverpool’s biggest problem may lie in their reputation. Hodgson may have saved Fulham from relegation and moulded them into a capable outfit, but they were often playing teams who were open and not afraid of going for the jugular. Liverpool however, are still a club that can inspire fear, and with big names likes Gerrard, Torres and Reina, opposing sides often set-up with men behind the ball, frustrating the Merseysiders and limiting their opportunities.
It would be no surprise if at the time this article was published Hodgson had either handed in his resignation or had it terminated. His appointment was generally to be considered as a stop-gap. He was an elderly, experienced coach, who, though often appeared to be going blind, could help guide Liverpool through what was always going to be a transitional period.
The mid-table position comes as no surprise to many who have seen the decline of the team in the last 18 months or so, but many of the Kop faithful have found it hard during this period to accept Hodgson as the bloke responsible for managing their beloved club.
However, Hodgson should surely have not been expected to win titles and trophies. He was hardly achieving such feats at Fulham during his reign at Craven Cottage; instead he was battling against the odds and achieving commendable results and performances on a shoe-string budget. Indeed many Liverpool fans that were aware of financial restraints in the summer saw Hodgson as the perfect replacement to deal with such circumstances, due to his Fulham record.
Inheriting a Liverpool team in decline, Hodgson’s role was to steady the Liverpool ship and rebuild for the future, possibly for another manager to take charge when the team looks like it can win big trophies again, and consequently win all the plaudits. Rather like when former-boss Benitez took over Gerard Houlier's side in 2004.
There is nothing wrong with replacing Hodgson mid-season, and replacing him with someone like the heavily respected but equally-dour Kenny Dalglish. Most Liverpool fans would most probably desire a manager who isn't making decisions like playing Ngog and Torres up front together, employing Raul Meireles in a wide position, or simply playing Paul Konchesky.
Indeed, if something is not working and you don’t intend to continue with the set-up in a few years time anyway, then by all means cut your losses. However, as other teams get richer and rivals improve, Liverpool cannot afford to slip too far away. The club lacks a direction and a plan of attack – on and off the field. A short-term replacement for Hodgson however, is unlikely to have the galvanising effect that most Liverpool fans would like.
Finally, for those of you who wish to see old Roy first step on the shores of Liverpool docks back in the summer, please look at this rare clip...
Sunday, 5 December 2010
Why Wenger Should Be Praised
Arsene Wenger seems to split opinion even amongst his own fans. When the relatively-unknown Frenchman first joined the Gunners back in 1996, he revolutionised a club that had been in transition ever since George Graham left over 12 months earlier. His replacement Bruce Rioch had only lasted a year at the club since being appointed boss in 1995, as he struggled to impose himself on the London giants.
Rioch signed Chris Kiwomya. Then again he signed Dennis Bergkamp, thus he will always be remembered somewhat-fondly at Arsenal. However, playing with the likes of Ray Parlour and David Hillier was probably not the experience Arsenal Chairman Peter Hill-Wood had sold to him, and Arsenal fans were rightly worried that Bergkamp may not have been happy if things continued.
We all remember the statements from Arsenal players a month or so into Wenger’s reign, as Arsenal improved dramatically. It almost got tiresome. The once rigid and weary-looking back four suddenly turned into sprightly, yoga-loving teenagers, expressing themselves, and each praised Wenger for giving them mental strength and belief.
Nearly fifteen years on and Wenger is still at the helm. He is now Arsenal’s most successful manager ever, despite the club not having won a trophy since 2005. For a Frenchman with no previous knowledge of English football (a fact Sir Alex Ferguson once famously castrated Wenger for when Wenger began to criticise fixture congestion), achieving such success is nothing short of remarkable. As Jonathan Pearce commented on last night’s Match of the Day, Wenger is soon approaching his 17th semi-final when they meet Wigan in the League Cup .
However, Wenger’s insistence on his policy of filling a team with skilful players who love to pass the ball, feel the ball and caress the ball has attracted criticism from people who are unhappy when this style does not get results. It is an old argument now, one that has been going for years, and one that doesn’t look like going away anytime soon if Match of the Day continues to keep the likes of Alan Hansen and the old biddy Mark Lawrenson in jobs.
It is a criticism often forgotten when Wenger’s side are in-form and picking up results, and those who are in Wenger’s camp must often melt in anger at the hypocrisy at times of the British media. How many times have we lazily heard pundits criticise Arsenal for lacking a more direct ‘Plan B’ when attacking, only to hail the magical passing style of the ‘Plan A’ that rips apart a team the week after with no acknowledgment of the prior criticism dished out. You cannot have it both ways Mr Pundit.
The other criticism of his recent sides has been the perceived ‘lack of backbone’ that supposedly leaves a soft centre for aggressive teams to take advantage off. Wenger’s early Arsenal sides had a strong midfield pairing of Emmanuel Petit and Patrick Vieira, but since the two departed, Wenger has chosen to feature neat, technical centre midfielders instead of a more combative type.
The current midfield features a very similar type of player. Cesc Fabregas, Samir Nasri, Tomas Rosicky, Denilson, and Andrei Arshavin are all skilful, diminutive right-footed players with great technique. The promising left-footed Jack Wilshire appears to be offering simply a Southpaws version of the aforementioned players, rather than offering an alternative. Alex Song and Abou Diaby have a significantly bigger physique than them, but DIaby is deceptive and is a box to box player with a fine touch, and Alex Song would prefer to stay on his feet than slide in like a rampaging Scott Parker.
Wenger’s team does have a major weakness in that their defence is not up to the standards set by his previous Arsenal sides. Laurent Koscielny and Sebastien Squillachi have not yet settled and they have missed Thomas Vermaelen badly. Those who argue that Arsenal’s defence is not protected enough by its midfield should note that that Manchester United’s first choice defensive partnership of Rio Ferdinand and Nemanja Vidic are consistently excellent despite United not employing a ‘Makalele-type’ midfielder in front of them.
Arsenal’s midfield, according to some will never win anything, with robust Premiership sides like Stoke and Wolves getting ‘stuck in’, ‘winning the battle’ and making the Gunners drop vital points consistently. It is this that apparently leaves some Arsenal fans frustrated with Wenger, and when pundits every week are saying the same thing, mud sticks.
Wenger’s disbelievers consider Wenger of being either ignorant, naïve, or not good enough to instil physical competencies in midfield, but the simple truth is that the manager, as always, sees it differently. Rather than trying to improve on areas with apparent deficiencies, Wenger tries to improve on his teams strengths.
Let us not forget the first half of the first leg between Arsenal and Barcelona in the Champions League last season. Arsenal were destroyed in that half not by a side who were intent on disrupting their play, but by a side that simply wouldn’t let them have the ball (Although admittedly Barcelona did work extremely hard when they didn’t have the ball).
Barcelona are undoubtedly the benchmark for Wenger, and although some clubs are so far away from the standard of the Catalan giants, Wenger knows that his team are close to emulating them. Consequently Wenger tries to maintain a fluent passing style, which we all know has looked ridiculously good at times and has outplayed the very best.
Wenger entered the Premiership with an open mind, a thinker. It is clear he sees the way Arsenal play as the way to success. He doesn’t want to play like anyone else, he doesn’t want to bow to media and fan pressure to buy more physical and experienced players, but he does want to win trophies.
Does every team have to play the same way? With a defensive midfielder in front of a back 4, a big striker up front with aerial presence or a five-man midfield to suffocate the opposition? All are viable tactics but it is up to the manager to see what he feels best. This is Arsenal’s most successful and longest serving manager after all.
Why thus, should anyone try and mould a free-flowing easy-on-the-eye Arsenal side into something that we believe could be more productive if it means we lose the charm and beauty of their style of play? It would be criminal for Arsenal or Wenger to change their principles. Wenger should stick to his Plan A, just as Spain and Barcelona do, and he deserves a lot more respect from what he currently gets.
Let’s not forget, children growing up playing the game look to those they watch every weekend for influence on their own game, copying their stopovers etc. If the future of England international football is to improve, it will do no harm for children to see players passing the ball to each other patiently and skilfully, with an emphasis on technique and possession. Spain and Barcelona have re-written the rule-book as to how to become successful at the very top level, and the youth of today should aspire to play like them and not like a side managed by Sam Allardyce or Mick McCarthy.
With Robin Van Persie essentially having been out of the first team for 12 months, and Cesc Fabregas suffering from injury problems this season, Arsenal have been shy of arguably their two most talented players this term, yet find themselves top of the league at the time of writing. Samir Nasri’s fantastic double yesterday against Fulham proved that other players are stepping up, and with the lack of a decent top Premiership side left in the League Cup it looks likely that Wenger will finally win a first trophy since 2005, a trophy he has not yet won. It may not be the only trophy he picks up this season.
Rioch signed Chris Kiwomya. Then again he signed Dennis Bergkamp, thus he will always be remembered somewhat-fondly at Arsenal. However, playing with the likes of Ray Parlour and David Hillier was probably not the experience Arsenal Chairman Peter Hill-Wood had sold to him, and Arsenal fans were rightly worried that Bergkamp may not have been happy if things continued.
We all remember the statements from Arsenal players a month or so into Wenger’s reign, as Arsenal improved dramatically. It almost got tiresome. The once rigid and weary-looking back four suddenly turned into sprightly, yoga-loving teenagers, expressing themselves, and each praised Wenger for giving them mental strength and belief.
Nearly fifteen years on and Wenger is still at the helm. He is now Arsenal’s most successful manager ever, despite the club not having won a trophy since 2005. For a Frenchman with no previous knowledge of English football (a fact Sir Alex Ferguson once famously castrated Wenger for when Wenger began to criticise fixture congestion), achieving such success is nothing short of remarkable. As Jonathan Pearce commented on last night’s Match of the Day, Wenger is soon approaching his 17th semi-final when they meet Wigan in the League Cup .
However, Wenger’s insistence on his policy of filling a team with skilful players who love to pass the ball, feel the ball and caress the ball has attracted criticism from people who are unhappy when this style does not get results. It is an old argument now, one that has been going for years, and one that doesn’t look like going away anytime soon if Match of the Day continues to keep the likes of Alan Hansen and the old biddy Mark Lawrenson in jobs.
It is a criticism often forgotten when Wenger’s side are in-form and picking up results, and those who are in Wenger’s camp must often melt in anger at the hypocrisy at times of the British media. How many times have we lazily heard pundits criticise Arsenal for lacking a more direct ‘Plan B’ when attacking, only to hail the magical passing style of the ‘Plan A’ that rips apart a team the week after with no acknowledgment of the prior criticism dished out. You cannot have it both ways Mr Pundit.
The other criticism of his recent sides has been the perceived ‘lack of backbone’ that supposedly leaves a soft centre for aggressive teams to take advantage off. Wenger’s early Arsenal sides had a strong midfield pairing of Emmanuel Petit and Patrick Vieira, but since the two departed, Wenger has chosen to feature neat, technical centre midfielders instead of a more combative type.
The current midfield features a very similar type of player. Cesc Fabregas, Samir Nasri, Tomas Rosicky, Denilson, and Andrei Arshavin are all skilful, diminutive right-footed players with great technique. The promising left-footed Jack Wilshire appears to be offering simply a Southpaws version of the aforementioned players, rather than offering an alternative. Alex Song and Abou Diaby have a significantly bigger physique than them, but DIaby is deceptive and is a box to box player with a fine touch, and Alex Song would prefer to stay on his feet than slide in like a rampaging Scott Parker.
Wenger’s team does have a major weakness in that their defence is not up to the standards set by his previous Arsenal sides. Laurent Koscielny and Sebastien Squillachi have not yet settled and they have missed Thomas Vermaelen badly. Those who argue that Arsenal’s defence is not protected enough by its midfield should note that that Manchester United’s first choice defensive partnership of Rio Ferdinand and Nemanja Vidic are consistently excellent despite United not employing a ‘Makalele-type’ midfielder in front of them.
Arsenal’s midfield, according to some will never win anything, with robust Premiership sides like Stoke and Wolves getting ‘stuck in’, ‘winning the battle’ and making the Gunners drop vital points consistently. It is this that apparently leaves some Arsenal fans frustrated with Wenger, and when pundits every week are saying the same thing, mud sticks.
Wenger’s disbelievers consider Wenger of being either ignorant, naïve, or not good enough to instil physical competencies in midfield, but the simple truth is that the manager, as always, sees it differently. Rather than trying to improve on areas with apparent deficiencies, Wenger tries to improve on his teams strengths.
Let us not forget the first half of the first leg between Arsenal and Barcelona in the Champions League last season. Arsenal were destroyed in that half not by a side who were intent on disrupting their play, but by a side that simply wouldn’t let them have the ball (Although admittedly Barcelona did work extremely hard when they didn’t have the ball).
Barcelona are undoubtedly the benchmark for Wenger, and although some clubs are so far away from the standard of the Catalan giants, Wenger knows that his team are close to emulating them. Consequently Wenger tries to maintain a fluent passing style, which we all know has looked ridiculously good at times and has outplayed the very best.
Wenger entered the Premiership with an open mind, a thinker. It is clear he sees the way Arsenal play as the way to success. He doesn’t want to play like anyone else, he doesn’t want to bow to media and fan pressure to buy more physical and experienced players, but he does want to win trophies.
Does every team have to play the same way? With a defensive midfielder in front of a back 4, a big striker up front with aerial presence or a five-man midfield to suffocate the opposition? All are viable tactics but it is up to the manager to see what he feels best. This is Arsenal’s most successful and longest serving manager after all.
Why thus, should anyone try and mould a free-flowing easy-on-the-eye Arsenal side into something that we believe could be more productive if it means we lose the charm and beauty of their style of play? It would be criminal for Arsenal or Wenger to change their principles. Wenger should stick to his Plan A, just as Spain and Barcelona do, and he deserves a lot more respect from what he currently gets.
Let’s not forget, children growing up playing the game look to those they watch every weekend for influence on their own game, copying their stopovers etc. If the future of England international football is to improve, it will do no harm for children to see players passing the ball to each other patiently and skilfully, with an emphasis on technique and possession. Spain and Barcelona have re-written the rule-book as to how to become successful at the very top level, and the youth of today should aspire to play like them and not like a side managed by Sam Allardyce or Mick McCarthy.
With Robin Van Persie essentially having been out of the first team for 12 months, and Cesc Fabregas suffering from injury problems this season, Arsenal have been shy of arguably their two most talented players this term, yet find themselves top of the league at the time of writing. Samir Nasri’s fantastic double yesterday against Fulham proved that other players are stepping up, and with the lack of a decent top Premiership side left in the League Cup it looks likely that Wenger will finally win a first trophy since 2005, a trophy he has not yet won. It may not be the only trophy he picks up this season.
Sunday, 21 November 2010
How do you solve a problem like Berbatov?
THERE are fewer frustrating sights on a football field than when a footballer doesn’t appear to be trying. No matter how much you cheer him on from the terraces, or indeed your own sofa, it’s like water off a duck’s back. The player in question has most likely got to where he is by having the exact same ethos throughout his career, right from youth football up to the first time he pulled on a shirt for his country.
Take Manchester United’s Dimitar Berbatov for example. The Bulgarian is often seen pacing somewhat leisurely around a football pitch, waiting for precision balls to his feet for him to conjure up a moment of magic, ignoring the responsibility of tracking back to help his team-mates. The mercurial Eric Cantona was not too dissimilar throughout his United career, though the Frenchman was a warrior in leadership and spirit, if not in physical graft. Cantona set the example for a breed of younger players like David Beckham and Paul Scholes, inspiring them to put extra hours in on the training ground in which to hone their skills, and attempt to fulfil the premise of ‘practice makes perfect.’ Even a poor last showing in the 1996/1997 season couldn’t put a black mark on what had been a fabulous career at United, with the Frenchman still conjuring up the ability to score arguably his most iconic United goal – that chip against Sunderland.
This season’s hat-trick against arch-rivals Liverpool looked to have helped Berbatov gain the hearts of United supporters that had criticised his attitude and end-product for a club that had spent £30m on him early in the 2008/09 season. However, just as the saying ‘form is temporary/class is permanent’ goes, Berbatov looks unlikely to change his ways. The lethargic swagger around the pitch which Berbatov exhibits is simply his style, and United fans wishing to see moments of brilliance will also have to put up with the more incredulous times.
The hat-trick appeared to have helped Berbatov also win over his critics. A week earlier he had swept in a fantastic goal against Everton, and the striker appeared to brimming with confidence as he led a forward line that appeared to be coping admirably without Wayne Rooney. Since then however, Berbatov appears to have fell into the same inconsistent form as we have seen from him since he joined the club in 2008, and it is well publicised that he is not managed a single goal since the Liverpool game.
Yesterday’s omission from the starting line-up against Wigan saw Sir Alex Ferguson confessed that he had chosen to simply leave Berbatov out, and there was not even a place on the bench for him. The United boss admitted: "I just left him out - picking my subs today I just thought I had to give a different type of variety.”
This is not the first time the Bulgarian has been left out of match-day squad completely this season. Berbatov did not feature in United’s previous home fixture against Wolves, a game in which United were poor in and needed a last-minute goal by Ji Sung Park to secure three points. Earlier in the season, Ferguson admitted to making a mistake by not including Berbatov in the squad for the Champions League fixture against Glasgow Rangers, a match that saw both teams draw blank.
Ferguson has always defended Berbatov openly in the press, and was particularly in high praise for the striker after the Liverpool game. Ferguson said: "There's been a lot of criticism of him, which happens at this club when we sign someone for big money and he isn't scoring a hat-trick every week. But there has never been any question about his ability.
"Lots of questions were asked about him last season and he was made something of a whipping boy, to the point where he must have wondered whether he had a future at Old Trafford. We could have avoided the worst of the aggravation if people had only asked themselves two questions. Firstly they should have queried whether the man had real ability, and the answer for me was undoubtedly yes. Next they should have looked to see if he was a Manchester United kind of player and, again, I think there was no doubt about him. I concede that at times he seemed to struggle but if you are satisfied about a player's credentials you must persevere and trust your judgment."
However, Ferguson is astute enough to know when a player is in poor form, and is brave enough to take action. Defenders Johnny Evans and John O’Shea were seen as culpable for the poor defensive showings of United earlier in the season, and the United manager has given few minutes on the pitch to the two ever since. Alarmingly for Evans, the Northern Ireland international has not played a single minute since the 2-2 draw at Bolton. Rio Ferdinand’s return has of course hampered Evans’ chances of game-time, and Evans’ lack of versatility compared to O’Shea does not aid him, but Ferguson has clearly sent a message to the defender. Berbatov himself will be given no differential treatment.
Indeed it was the 2-2 draw at Aston Villa last weekend which prompted Ferguson’s surprising line-up yesterday against Wigan. United were poor in most areas at Villa Park, but the decision to replace both Berbatov and striker Javier Hernandez early in the second half was a sign that Ferguson had become ultimately frustrated with the output of United’s forward line. Berbatov may well have complained about a lack of service from a stagnant midfield, but one needs to only look at Sunderland’s Darren Bent to see that a striker can still score and lead the line effectively without world-class support. Hernandez, in his first season with the club, looks a fantastic prospect and has plenty more to offer, but Berbatov’s lacklustre performance must have given Ferguson some serious grievances about a player that cost the club £30m.
Berbatov started his career at United in a decent fashion. In the league, he reached double-figures in assists, and with a similar amount of goals to his own name he looked to have a bright future at Old Trafford. Indeed a couple of scrappy goals at home to Celtic in the Champions League gave a suggestion that Berbatov might well be the classy poacher that United have lacked since Ruud Van Nistelrooy’s departure in 2006.
For all the class that Berbatov possessed, the languid style of his football slowly frustrated the United fans that wanted him to become a legend. United fans the season previously had seen a fabulous front-three of Cristiano Ronaldo, Wayne Rooney and Carlos Tevez bring home the Champions League as well as retain the Premiership title. That front-line had skill, power, pace and goals. Ronaldo won the FIFA World Player of the Year in 2008, and Rooney and Tevez proved that having hard-working strikers blessed with an abundance of talent really is the best attributes a manager could want.
It was somewhat strange then that Ferguson chose to spend such money on an area that was arguably the best in Europe at the time, although the United manager may have already foreseen that Carlos Tevez would not have a long-term future with the club. The injury-prone Louis Saha would have also given Ferguson concerns about strength-in-depth, and the Frenchman was shipped off to Everton around the same time Berbatov was signed.
If Ferguson is looking to sell Berbatov this summer, United’s strength in depth is something he will have to consider, and it may well seal Berbatov’s fate.
Wayne Rooney will be looking to hit the same form he reached last season now he is back from injury, and few doubts remain that he will, once he wins over the United fans again. Hernandez is a fantastic talent with pace, goals, heading ability and technique, and it will be him and Rooney that will spearhead United’s title challenge. Young Federico Macheda still has his doubters amongst the Old Trafford faithful, but United’s backroom staff have undoubted faith in the Italian’s ability to improve. His terrific strike against Villa last week would have done him a world of good. Danny Welbeck has also shown signs of improvement during his loan spell at Sunderland, and Ferguson would have been delighted to see his young forward destroy Chelsea in last Sunday’s 3-0 victory at Stamford Bridge.
Such young talent however, does lack the experience Ferguson craves, particularly when competing in Europe. Indeed, it was Berbatov’s experience, technique and patience that was expected to help United fare better, particularly as United (up till the 2007/2008 season), were struggling away from home. Unfortunately for Berbatov, Rooney’s improvement in operating as a main striker last year restricted his appearances. Such success with Rooney as the front man in a 4-5-1/4-3-3 formation inspired Ferguson to implement tactics in league games as well as in Europe.
Berbatov’s ability to bring others into the game is unrivalled at United, and this unselfishness hampered his own goal-scoring record. He had scored 15 league goals in his final season at Tottenham and thus looked to be a complete package when United finally showed serious interest in signing him. However, goals at United have generally been shared around throughout Ferguson’s reign, and this has been very much the case since Berbatov’s arrival.
The Bulgarian is often derived for being in deeper positions than United fans would like, despite these positions often being determined by the tactics of Ferguson himself. Berbatov would also have found it frustrating how he wasn’t picked for the ‘big’ fixtures last season, only thrust into the action against inferior opposition. Thus when he does get a chance he is often so starved of confidence by the manager that he is unlikely to get on the score-sheet, particularly as he is expected to threaten the goal from non-threatening, deep-lying positions.
It is becoming more and more apparent that Berbatov will most likely be playing his football elsewhere this time next year, despite Ferguson’s praise of the striker earlier this season. Loved more by football purists than fans and critics, the striker still has a good few years in him to leave his mark on the game, and will undoubtedly still have an important part to play this season for United. Neutrals would love to see Berbatov continue to play regularly in the Premiership, and players returning to Spurs and Harry Redknapp are not uncommon, but one hopes that his United career hasn’t damaged the confidence in which he used to use to enormous effectiveness.
Take Manchester United’s Dimitar Berbatov for example. The Bulgarian is often seen pacing somewhat leisurely around a football pitch, waiting for precision balls to his feet for him to conjure up a moment of magic, ignoring the responsibility of tracking back to help his team-mates. The mercurial Eric Cantona was not too dissimilar throughout his United career, though the Frenchman was a warrior in leadership and spirit, if not in physical graft. Cantona set the example for a breed of younger players like David Beckham and Paul Scholes, inspiring them to put extra hours in on the training ground in which to hone their skills, and attempt to fulfil the premise of ‘practice makes perfect.’ Even a poor last showing in the 1996/1997 season couldn’t put a black mark on what had been a fabulous career at United, with the Frenchman still conjuring up the ability to score arguably his most iconic United goal – that chip against Sunderland.
This season’s hat-trick against arch-rivals Liverpool looked to have helped Berbatov gain the hearts of United supporters that had criticised his attitude and end-product for a club that had spent £30m on him early in the 2008/09 season. However, just as the saying ‘form is temporary/class is permanent’ goes, Berbatov looks unlikely to change his ways. The lethargic swagger around the pitch which Berbatov exhibits is simply his style, and United fans wishing to see moments of brilliance will also have to put up with the more incredulous times.
The hat-trick appeared to have helped Berbatov also win over his critics. A week earlier he had swept in a fantastic goal against Everton, and the striker appeared to brimming with confidence as he led a forward line that appeared to be coping admirably without Wayne Rooney. Since then however, Berbatov appears to have fell into the same inconsistent form as we have seen from him since he joined the club in 2008, and it is well publicised that he is not managed a single goal since the Liverpool game.
Yesterday’s omission from the starting line-up against Wigan saw Sir Alex Ferguson confessed that he had chosen to simply leave Berbatov out, and there was not even a place on the bench for him. The United boss admitted: "I just left him out - picking my subs today I just thought I had to give a different type of variety.”
This is not the first time the Bulgarian has been left out of match-day squad completely this season. Berbatov did not feature in United’s previous home fixture against Wolves, a game in which United were poor in and needed a last-minute goal by Ji Sung Park to secure three points. Earlier in the season, Ferguson admitted to making a mistake by not including Berbatov in the squad for the Champions League fixture against Glasgow Rangers, a match that saw both teams draw blank.
Ferguson has always defended Berbatov openly in the press, and was particularly in high praise for the striker after the Liverpool game. Ferguson said: "There's been a lot of criticism of him, which happens at this club when we sign someone for big money and he isn't scoring a hat-trick every week. But there has never been any question about his ability.
"Lots of questions were asked about him last season and he was made something of a whipping boy, to the point where he must have wondered whether he had a future at Old Trafford. We could have avoided the worst of the aggravation if people had only asked themselves two questions. Firstly they should have queried whether the man had real ability, and the answer for me was undoubtedly yes. Next they should have looked to see if he was a Manchester United kind of player and, again, I think there was no doubt about him. I concede that at times he seemed to struggle but if you are satisfied about a player's credentials you must persevere and trust your judgment."
However, Ferguson is astute enough to know when a player is in poor form, and is brave enough to take action. Defenders Johnny Evans and John O’Shea were seen as culpable for the poor defensive showings of United earlier in the season, and the United manager has given few minutes on the pitch to the two ever since. Alarmingly for Evans, the Northern Ireland international has not played a single minute since the 2-2 draw at Bolton. Rio Ferdinand’s return has of course hampered Evans’ chances of game-time, and Evans’ lack of versatility compared to O’Shea does not aid him, but Ferguson has clearly sent a message to the defender. Berbatov himself will be given no differential treatment.
Indeed it was the 2-2 draw at Aston Villa last weekend which prompted Ferguson’s surprising line-up yesterday against Wigan. United were poor in most areas at Villa Park, but the decision to replace both Berbatov and striker Javier Hernandez early in the second half was a sign that Ferguson had become ultimately frustrated with the output of United’s forward line. Berbatov may well have complained about a lack of service from a stagnant midfield, but one needs to only look at Sunderland’s Darren Bent to see that a striker can still score and lead the line effectively without world-class support. Hernandez, in his first season with the club, looks a fantastic prospect and has plenty more to offer, but Berbatov’s lacklustre performance must have given Ferguson some serious grievances about a player that cost the club £30m.
Berbatov started his career at United in a decent fashion. In the league, he reached double-figures in assists, and with a similar amount of goals to his own name he looked to have a bright future at Old Trafford. Indeed a couple of scrappy goals at home to Celtic in the Champions League gave a suggestion that Berbatov might well be the classy poacher that United have lacked since Ruud Van Nistelrooy’s departure in 2006.
For all the class that Berbatov possessed, the languid style of his football slowly frustrated the United fans that wanted him to become a legend. United fans the season previously had seen a fabulous front-three of Cristiano Ronaldo, Wayne Rooney and Carlos Tevez bring home the Champions League as well as retain the Premiership title. That front-line had skill, power, pace and goals. Ronaldo won the FIFA World Player of the Year in 2008, and Rooney and Tevez proved that having hard-working strikers blessed with an abundance of talent really is the best attributes a manager could want.
It was somewhat strange then that Ferguson chose to spend such money on an area that was arguably the best in Europe at the time, although the United manager may have already foreseen that Carlos Tevez would not have a long-term future with the club. The injury-prone Louis Saha would have also given Ferguson concerns about strength-in-depth, and the Frenchman was shipped off to Everton around the same time Berbatov was signed.
If Ferguson is looking to sell Berbatov this summer, United’s strength in depth is something he will have to consider, and it may well seal Berbatov’s fate.
Wayne Rooney will be looking to hit the same form he reached last season now he is back from injury, and few doubts remain that he will, once he wins over the United fans again. Hernandez is a fantastic talent with pace, goals, heading ability and technique, and it will be him and Rooney that will spearhead United’s title challenge. Young Federico Macheda still has his doubters amongst the Old Trafford faithful, but United’s backroom staff have undoubted faith in the Italian’s ability to improve. His terrific strike against Villa last week would have done him a world of good. Danny Welbeck has also shown signs of improvement during his loan spell at Sunderland, and Ferguson would have been delighted to see his young forward destroy Chelsea in last Sunday’s 3-0 victory at Stamford Bridge.
Such young talent however, does lack the experience Ferguson craves, particularly when competing in Europe. Indeed, it was Berbatov’s experience, technique and patience that was expected to help United fare better, particularly as United (up till the 2007/2008 season), were struggling away from home. Unfortunately for Berbatov, Rooney’s improvement in operating as a main striker last year restricted his appearances. Such success with Rooney as the front man in a 4-5-1/4-3-3 formation inspired Ferguson to implement tactics in league games as well as in Europe.
Berbatov’s ability to bring others into the game is unrivalled at United, and this unselfishness hampered his own goal-scoring record. He had scored 15 league goals in his final season at Tottenham and thus looked to be a complete package when United finally showed serious interest in signing him. However, goals at United have generally been shared around throughout Ferguson’s reign, and this has been very much the case since Berbatov’s arrival.
The Bulgarian is often derived for being in deeper positions than United fans would like, despite these positions often being determined by the tactics of Ferguson himself. Berbatov would also have found it frustrating how he wasn’t picked for the ‘big’ fixtures last season, only thrust into the action against inferior opposition. Thus when he does get a chance he is often so starved of confidence by the manager that he is unlikely to get on the score-sheet, particularly as he is expected to threaten the goal from non-threatening, deep-lying positions.
It is becoming more and more apparent that Berbatov will most likely be playing his football elsewhere this time next year, despite Ferguson’s praise of the striker earlier this season. Loved more by football purists than fans and critics, the striker still has a good few years in him to leave his mark on the game, and will undoubtedly still have an important part to play this season for United. Neutrals would love to see Berbatov continue to play regularly in the Premiership, and players returning to Spurs and Harry Redknapp are not uncommon, but one hopes that his United career hasn’t damaged the confidence in which he used to use to enormous effectiveness.
Friday, 15 October 2010
Wayne Rooney - Born of Frustration
WAYNE Rooney has frustrated many a football fan in recent years, particularly those supporting the team he is playing against. However, this week provoked debate amongst even his own Manchester United fans as to whether he is doing all he can to lift himself out of the barren spell he finds himself in.
The Old Trafford faithful have adopted ‘The White Pele’ as one of their own, a far cry from one of their first glimpses of Rooney as a cocky Merseyside scally playing for Everton. Indeed, the Stretford End’s chants of “Have you ever had a salad? Have you f*ck!” provoked a then-tubby Rooney into hacking down young emerging talent Cristiano Ronaldo with such force you would think Ronaldo had hidden Rooney's Mars Bar. However, two years later, a chocolate-free Rooney was lining up with Ronaldo as the two looked to bring back glory to a Manchester United side in transition.
Seven years down the line, and recent comments to the media have surprised many, concerning his recent form and fitness. Rooney seemed to cast aside any arguments about his fitness of late, by stating his ‘troublesome’ ankle has been fine all season. This, despite the fact that both Sir Alex Ferguson and his assistant Mike Phelan (who must rival Ralph Milne as one of Ferguson’s worst signings) have openly indicated that Rooney has had a problem with it. Speaking after England’s qualifier against Montenegro, Rooney said: “I’ve had no ankle problem all season.” Of course, Rooney may well believe he is fit enough, and is simply taking some of the blame himself. Ferguson on the other hand, as the superb man-manager he always has been, is protecting his own player. Phelan on the other hand is simply doing a "Yes-Boss" job that would make Phil Neal proud, and Graham Taylor orange with rage.
With Ferguson claiming Rooney’s on-the-pitch problems have been physical, it’s more likely that Rooney is suffering from the same mental problems that have blighted his short career to date. Despite Rooney’s intimidating presence on the pitch, his high-tempered aggression, and his tremendous will to win, Rooney has had more than couple of notable bleak periods in his career, where goals have dried up and his usually-assured touch has eluded him.
Of course, much has been said about Rooney needing to mature, about his need to learn how to control both his aggression and also his instincts to track back. As a teenager, Rooney was arguably a more explosive player than he is now, being more prone to run at defenders, rather than his modern game which sees him looking more likely to create something from an exchange of passes or to deliver a deadly through ball. Even his aptitude for long-range shooting seems to have dwindled somewhat, much to the relief of goalkeepers.
However, as he approaches his 25th birthday this month, Rooney needs to focus on his game more than ever. He needs to cut out the media-work for a start, although rumours have it that sponsors have been less than impressed with his recent misdemeanours with women other than his wife, thus some of these decisions may be taken out of his 'busy' hands.
The awful Street Striker TV programme on Sky One, which Rooney attaches his less than glitzy name to, should be the next to go. With today’s modern innovative coaching techniques, it seems unlikely that monitoring a bunch of teenagers run around an industrial estate avoiding a bunch of dead cats, whilst attempting to chip the ball into a disused skip is not going to mould them into the new Lionel Messi.
If it’s not the off-the-field distractions, we must look on the pitch. Confidence can affect everyone, but Rooney seems to suffer most. Though for a player with his reputation, being a ‘confidence’ player is not acceptable. Indeed, an argument can be made that the best players have supreme confidence at all times – their confidence in their own ability overshadowing any distraction or factors that may try and lessen their performance.
His ex-team-mate Ronaldo for example, is as popular as George Best was for his celebrity status as much as his footballing competence. However, Ronaldo, despite his tendency to flop around the pitch with his arms flailing and deploying THAT facial expression, has a steely, unflappable confidence, which has helped him reach the highest levels of his capabilities. However, Rooney’s goal-droughts and losses of form are becoming much too common and are often unexplainable. Such inconsistency is threatening to affect Rooney’s status as one of the country’s finest ever players.
In Rooney’s defence, Ronaldo rarely suffered from injuries during his time at United, whereas Rooney unfortunately picked up impact knocks such as metatarsal injuries, which were beyond his control. However, it is the less obvious injuries that many have speculated that Rooney has been suffering from, which is the cause for debate. His manager Ferguson has tried to put a positive spin on the issue, claiming it is Rooney’s eagerness to play with injuries that can be his downfall. If this is the case, is it not up to Sir Alex to and his medical team to decide what is best for the team, the player, and the club in the long run? Ferguson it seems, may be giving Rooney more liberty than he has ever given one of his players since the Scot took the reins at Old Trafford.
Despite appearing to be a family man, who is perfectly happy living the rest of his life out in the North-West, Rooney has developed an ego in other areas, and somewhat of a superiority complex. His obvious frustrations with England’s performance in the World Cup led to an outburst on camera abusing England fans for booing the players. Sorry Wayne, but whether booing or not is particularly constructive, fans who travelled to South Africa had every right to express their own opinions on the England team after such an abject display. His outburst was almost definitely pre-meditated, meaning Rooney, in his own mind, believes he is justified in such actions, and that he can ‘do no wrong and basically ‘do as he wants’. It wouldn't have been too surprising if he'd blamed Steve McClaren. When his head goes in a match, he simply cannot mentally pick himself up again. It’s this maturity issue that is harming his game.
Rooney, like Fernando Torres in some aspects, is running out of excuses when it comes to explaining his own personal performances. Torres, in his defence, has had injury problems, though his attitude, particularly in body language, has been nothing short of childish over the last 18 months. Within just a few months of his arrival in the summer of 2007, neutrals marvelled at the skills and goal-scoring talents of the Spaniard – a foreign player taking wonderfully to the Premiership in a similar vein to Gianfranco Zola and Jurgen Klinsmann when they moved to Premiership football in the mid 1990’s. Now Torres has become a victim, or a parody if you will, of the egotistic ways of the Premiership, where money and big club aura’s rule, and lesser clubs and players are looked on in disdain by expensive big-club imports. However, this issue is for another day…
Rooney is at home to West Brom this weekend, and although now playing in a deeper role to last season, mainly due to the excellent form of Dimitar Berbatov this term, Rooney is still capable of a world-class display. As he proved last season when he hit a season’s best goal tally, and produced terrific form both in domestic and European competitions, Rooney is a world-beater on his day, and is arguably the striker most defenders in the Champions League fear most, such is the variety of his game combined with a fantastic work-ethic. However, he must achieve consistency quickly for his stock to rise again.
The Old Trafford faithful have adopted ‘The White Pele’ as one of their own, a far cry from one of their first glimpses of Rooney as a cocky Merseyside scally playing for Everton. Indeed, the Stretford End’s chants of “Have you ever had a salad? Have you f*ck!” provoked a then-tubby Rooney into hacking down young emerging talent Cristiano Ronaldo with such force you would think Ronaldo had hidden Rooney's Mars Bar. However, two years later, a chocolate-free Rooney was lining up with Ronaldo as the two looked to bring back glory to a Manchester United side in transition.
Seven years down the line, and recent comments to the media have surprised many, concerning his recent form and fitness. Rooney seemed to cast aside any arguments about his fitness of late, by stating his ‘troublesome’ ankle has been fine all season. This, despite the fact that both Sir Alex Ferguson and his assistant Mike Phelan (who must rival Ralph Milne as one of Ferguson’s worst signings) have openly indicated that Rooney has had a problem with it. Speaking after England’s qualifier against Montenegro, Rooney said: “I’ve had no ankle problem all season.” Of course, Rooney may well believe he is fit enough, and is simply taking some of the blame himself. Ferguson on the other hand, as the superb man-manager he always has been, is protecting his own player. Phelan on the other hand is simply doing a "Yes-Boss" job that would make Phil Neal proud, and Graham Taylor orange with rage.
With Ferguson claiming Rooney’s on-the-pitch problems have been physical, it’s more likely that Rooney is suffering from the same mental problems that have blighted his short career to date. Despite Rooney’s intimidating presence on the pitch, his high-tempered aggression, and his tremendous will to win, Rooney has had more than couple of notable bleak periods in his career, where goals have dried up and his usually-assured touch has eluded him.
Of course, much has been said about Rooney needing to mature, about his need to learn how to control both his aggression and also his instincts to track back. As a teenager, Rooney was arguably a more explosive player than he is now, being more prone to run at defenders, rather than his modern game which sees him looking more likely to create something from an exchange of passes or to deliver a deadly through ball. Even his aptitude for long-range shooting seems to have dwindled somewhat, much to the relief of goalkeepers.
However, as he approaches his 25th birthday this month, Rooney needs to focus on his game more than ever. He needs to cut out the media-work for a start, although rumours have it that sponsors have been less than impressed with his recent misdemeanours with women other than his wife, thus some of these decisions may be taken out of his 'busy' hands.
The awful Street Striker TV programme on Sky One, which Rooney attaches his less than glitzy name to, should be the next to go. With today’s modern innovative coaching techniques, it seems unlikely that monitoring a bunch of teenagers run around an industrial estate avoiding a bunch of dead cats, whilst attempting to chip the ball into a disused skip is not going to mould them into the new Lionel Messi.
If it’s not the off-the-field distractions, we must look on the pitch. Confidence can affect everyone, but Rooney seems to suffer most. Though for a player with his reputation, being a ‘confidence’ player is not acceptable. Indeed, an argument can be made that the best players have supreme confidence at all times – their confidence in their own ability overshadowing any distraction or factors that may try and lessen their performance.
His ex-team-mate Ronaldo for example, is as popular as George Best was for his celebrity status as much as his footballing competence. However, Ronaldo, despite his tendency to flop around the pitch with his arms flailing and deploying THAT facial expression, has a steely, unflappable confidence, which has helped him reach the highest levels of his capabilities. However, Rooney’s goal-droughts and losses of form are becoming much too common and are often unexplainable. Such inconsistency is threatening to affect Rooney’s status as one of the country’s finest ever players.
In Rooney’s defence, Ronaldo rarely suffered from injuries during his time at United, whereas Rooney unfortunately picked up impact knocks such as metatarsal injuries, which were beyond his control. However, it is the less obvious injuries that many have speculated that Rooney has been suffering from, which is the cause for debate. His manager Ferguson has tried to put a positive spin on the issue, claiming it is Rooney’s eagerness to play with injuries that can be his downfall. If this is the case, is it not up to Sir Alex to and his medical team to decide what is best for the team, the player, and the club in the long run? Ferguson it seems, may be giving Rooney more liberty than he has ever given one of his players since the Scot took the reins at Old Trafford.
Despite appearing to be a family man, who is perfectly happy living the rest of his life out in the North-West, Rooney has developed an ego in other areas, and somewhat of a superiority complex. His obvious frustrations with England’s performance in the World Cup led to an outburst on camera abusing England fans for booing the players. Sorry Wayne, but whether booing or not is particularly constructive, fans who travelled to South Africa had every right to express their own opinions on the England team after such an abject display. His outburst was almost definitely pre-meditated, meaning Rooney, in his own mind, believes he is justified in such actions, and that he can ‘do no wrong and basically ‘do as he wants’. It wouldn't have been too surprising if he'd blamed Steve McClaren. When his head goes in a match, he simply cannot mentally pick himself up again. It’s this maturity issue that is harming his game.
Rooney, like Fernando Torres in some aspects, is running out of excuses when it comes to explaining his own personal performances. Torres, in his defence, has had injury problems, though his attitude, particularly in body language, has been nothing short of childish over the last 18 months. Within just a few months of his arrival in the summer of 2007, neutrals marvelled at the skills and goal-scoring talents of the Spaniard – a foreign player taking wonderfully to the Premiership in a similar vein to Gianfranco Zola and Jurgen Klinsmann when they moved to Premiership football in the mid 1990’s. Now Torres has become a victim, or a parody if you will, of the egotistic ways of the Premiership, where money and big club aura’s rule, and lesser clubs and players are looked on in disdain by expensive big-club imports. However, this issue is for another day…
Rooney is at home to West Brom this weekend, and although now playing in a deeper role to last season, mainly due to the excellent form of Dimitar Berbatov this term, Rooney is still capable of a world-class display. As he proved last season when he hit a season’s best goal tally, and produced terrific form both in domestic and European competitions, Rooney is a world-beater on his day, and is arguably the striker most defenders in the Champions League fear most, such is the variety of his game combined with a fantastic work-ethic. However, he must achieve consistency quickly for his stock to rise again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)